Holy Tuesday: a Riddle, a Paradox, an Invitation

Chrism. An anointing. The parable of the Ten Virgins. Covenant renewals. All of these things are tied together in history with the rich scarlet thread of Holy Tuesday, or Great Tuesday. Just a few days ago, we were waving palm branches and shouting “hosannas” in the sanctuary. The day was a paradoxical reprieve from the solemnity of Lent. Christ is the Messiah, Chosen One. The Savior we demanded, though perhaps not the one we were expecting or even wanting. We celebrated en masse, with a kind of special abandon we tend to reserve for our Christian gatherings. Now we move into the depths of Holy Week, retelling the riddle-stories Christ told, meditating on the veil that seems to grow thinner with each day, embracing the sobriety of this particular journey.

The theme for this day centers on the parable of the Ten Virgins from Matthew 25.1-13.

God’s kingdom is like ten young virgins who took oil lamps and went out to greet the bridegroom. Five were silly and five were smart. The silly virgins took lamps, but no extra oil. The smart virgins took jars of oil to feed their lamps. The bridegroom didn’t show up when they expected him, and they all fell asleep. In the middle of the night someone yelled out, ‘He’s here! The bridegroom’s here! Go out and greet him!’ The ten virgins got up and got their lamps ready. The silly virgins said to the smart ones, ‘Our lamps are going out; lend us some of your oil.’ They answered, ‘There might not be enough to go around; go buy your own.’ They did, but while they were out buying oil, the bridegroom arrived. When everyone who was there to greet him had gone into the wedding feast, the door was locked. Much later, the other virgins, the silly ones, showed up and knocked on the door, saying, ‘Master, we’re here. Let us in.’ He answered, ‘Do I know you? I don’t think I know you.’ So stay alert. You have no idea when he might arrive.

This story always confounded me. And what did it have to do with Holy Week?  The easy and obvious answer: the oil representing my good works. My morality. My separateness so that I was ready for the second coming of Christ. But… Jesus never acquiesced to the obvious and easy.

So, here we are, three days into Holy Week, meditating on this story, wanting to be one of the five who were prepared (but, if you grew up like I did, you were also guiltily and secretly dreading the dullness that role might entail). Yet here, on the cusp of one of the most mystical and magical events in all of time, the story opens itself up to us. The element: oil. Oil symbolizing engagedness, awareness, life-stewardship, wonder turned into grateful response, beauty, soul. Nobel Peace Prize Winner Elie Wiesel said:

The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it’s indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it’s indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it’s indifference.

My guess – the five lazy virgins weren’t immoral, or bad, or indulgent. They were indifferent. The practice: anointing. Anointing the sick, the soon-to-be baptized, the priests and shepherds of the people, anointing a world in the birth pains of an “on earth as it is in heaven” age, the seemingly ordinary moments of real life.

What does this story and these practices mean for us? What does it mean for our worship? No easy answer (ah, Jesus would be so proud) but one thing to consider: we don’t just curate pieces of liturgy or songs or images. We curate a collective anticipation of the kingdom. In doing so, we gather our jars of oil. And then we engage with all of our being – our imaginations, our bodies, our service, our wealth, our relationships, our time, our words, our paradoxical lives. This is our anointing on the Church. And on the world.

How do you intend to engage with this Holy Week? How does the image of anointing the world with your soul and the in-breaking kingdom inspire your worship?

The pervasive breath of GOD breathe on you as you act as story-teller and image-bearer this week.

image © iStockphoto

Share

Leading Lament

As worship curators we usually envision our main function as modeling and facilitating the praises of the people. The praise of God is certainly important and is modeled for us in the Psalms and throughout Scripture. But, there is another type of response to God also found in the Psalms that we tend to avoid like the plague. In fact, even in the midst of a plague, most of us would still avoid it.

I am speaking of lament.

A lament is a sorrowful outpouring of emotion for some kind of distress, whether physical, mental, or spiritual. Psalm 88 is a good – and particularly bleak – example. The psalmist starts with a very brief affirmation that God can save. Following this, the pray-er lays out his “troubles”, which include: being near-death (v.3), the loss of strength (v.4), and the loss of friends (v.8). Beyond all of this, God’s presence and actions are called into question. The writer claims to be “set apart with the dead,” and “cut off from [God's] care” (v.5). In verse 8 and in verse 18, he says that God is the one who has taken away his closest friends. Though this oppressed one cries out to God for help, the LORD remains hidden and has rejected his cries (v.14).

Does anyone wonder why Psalm 88 is not often listed among peoples’ favorite Psalms? And yet, God has chosen to include this type of prayer in the Book. In addition to this psalm, scripture contains other psalms of complaint, as well as the often-neglected book of Lamentations, and the often-misunderstood book of Job. Why did God figure we need such expressions of sorrow and what does this have to do with curating worship?

Renowned Psalms scholar Walter Brueggemann says that without lament our worship is reduced to “uncritical history-stifling praise.” He means that to neglect the acknowledgment of our painful situations before God leaves us only with shallow thanksgiving that denies an authentic relationship between worshipers and Yahweh. A failure to speak to God of our hurt is a failure to acknowledge that our world has gone bad. It is also a failure to present an opportunity for God to act on our behalf. In short, lacking lament, our relationship with God becomes similar to our shallow relationships with human acquaintances to whom we only expose our “brave face.” How can we as leaders bring the vital practice of lament back into our faith communities? Below, I suggest three of many possibilities.

First, we can become students of the parts of Scripture that model lament. Study psalms like 88, 89, 109, and others to see how praise and lament interact. Psalm 89 is an interesting example since it is full of pure praise until verse 38 after which point God is suddenly accused of having “renounced the covenant with [his] servant” (v.39). It seems that the psalmist is calling God to live up to the character and actions listed in verses 1-37. Notice that in this particular case, the psalm does not end with resolution or even praise. Immersing ourselves in scriptural laments will help us better understand the way God invites us to authentically express our struggles. As we learn, we can help those we lead to understand.

Second, we can compose prayers of lament on behalf of those individuals in our midst that are in pain. Practice by writing a lament from your own experience.

1) Start by acknowledging God’s past faithfulness.

2) Then, move to reflecting on a time when things were going fine and then went bad.

3) Express in metaphorical language how you cried out to God and the way God answered you – or didn’t.

4) Finish with some words of thanksgiving for God’s provision, or alternatively, words of hope toward God’s not-yet-realized act of salvation.

The above lament-writing exercise can be used for any particular life-situation in your community. Write a psalm of lament for someone who is hurting, share it with them, and then tell them how you are praying with them. Here’s a lament I wrote from my wife’s perspective when we were trying unsuccessfully to have a child.

Thirdly, we can give our congregations creative opportunities to express their anguish to God. Perhaps the final fruit of our growing familiarity with laments in the Bible, and of our practice writing our own pleas to God will be new songs or litanies that can be used in the congregation. There are many times throughout the year that laments are appropriate for worship. During Lent, confessional laments can be tremendously powerful when spoken together in the midst of worship. When your local body experiences the sudden death of a member, the community can express its grief through songs or readings that portray feelings of sadness and mourning. This practice should replace the way we typically avoid sorrow in worship and head straight to hope and peace. During Holy Week, your team might create an interactive Good Friday experience that embraces the horror of Christ’s crucifixion, allowing for contemplative space before simply rushing to the joy of resurrection. During seasons of personal, church-wide, or national crisis, reading aloud portions of laments from Scripture can result in hope for the future and jubilant thanksgiving as God eventually brings resolution to these situations.

In today’s culture, we much prefer hidden despair to open lament. We use consumerism, addictions, escapism, and even violence as mechanisms to help us deny the pain we truly experience in life. These methods of denial sometimes work so well that we even fool ourselves into thinking our lives are pain-free. As curators of worship, we can combat this cultural failure by learning about, practicing, and encouraging honest lament.

Brueggeman claims that without properly acknowledging God’s salvation from troubled times we have no real context to appropriately praise him. If we believe this to be true, we would be better leaders to embrace lament as one of our key methods toward prompting the praises of the people.

For more info try reading:
Walter Bruggeman’s article The Costly Loss of Lament and
Kathleen, O’Conner’s book Lamentations and the Tears of the World.

This post first appeared on Creative Worship Tour, April 15, 2010.

image © iStockphoto

Share

Someone Said

The Lutheran theologian Dorothee Sölle once said in a public lecture, “We must view with suspicion all theology that is pre-pain.” By this I presume she means that a theology, or any speech or writing about God, that ignores the practical and omnipresent reality of pain in people’s lives is not a theology worth having. This makes me think, tangentially, of Barth’s comment about Paul Tillich’s theology. Barth said it was bad theology because you couldn’t pray it.

The danger of getting lost in the world-within-world of ideas is an occupational hazard for theologians, or again, for any Christian. You can get lost in the world of activities. You can get lost in the world of feelings. The point is, every one of us faces the constant temptation to escape—to escape life, to escape suffering, to escape it all. Sölle urges us not to escape.

The playwright Samuel Beckett says we have only two options in this world: suffering or boredom. We get to choose which. As he puts it:

“The pendulum oscillates between these two terms:
Suffering—that opens a window on the real
and is the main condition of the artistic experience—
and Boredom.”

But it’s amazing how attractive boredom looks on the days when our suffering feels unbearable. Give me boredom. Give me distractions, wasteful hours, duties, people, noise, internet, or never-ending things to do and accomplish, but please don’t make me suffer any more.

I’m thinking about these things not only because it’s Lent, and thank God near the end of a difficult Lent in the younger Taylor household, but also because I’m beginning to do research for a seminar…to help participants understand how art teaches us not only about lament but how to lament.

In “The Art of Lament,” posted during Lent 2009, W. David O. Taylor asked his blog readers a question similar to our own Q of the Week. What art, he wondered, has been helpful in a time of sadness or helped to process grief.

Share

Answers of the Week: Good Friday Plans?

This week’s Q was: What are your plans for Good Friday worship this year?

The variety of responses included: a processional ‘Walk of the Cross,’ a Tenebrae candlelight service, adoration of the cross, stations of the cross, a prayer labyrinth, and the use of the same purple cloth in various ways for worship from Ash Wednesday, through Holy Saturday. Read full responses here.

Share

Finding the Narrative

This post was written by Steve Collins.

For me, as for Jodi-Renee Adams, the heart of curation lies in telling a story and inviting our fellow worshippers to follow, from one place or state of being to another. The curator and the team work to find a narrative path through the material and ideas available, editing and pruning them and discarding even the best material if it no longer fits the emerging story – there will be another time to use it.

The traditional shape of the Christian liturgy has a narrative that takes us from the world and self-interest to encounter and transformation, and back into the world again as God’s agents. I suspect that some of our boredom with inherited forms of worship comes from the obscuring or hollowing out of that narrative – parts are no longer legible, parts have been removed. Maybe the long Protestant sermon is a disruption, a part that usurps the whole! But the old journey is still a necessary one for our spiritual health. However, I think other journeys are possible.

a glass of wine flung like blood over symbols of the things we must die to

My own community, Grace in London, has always used a particular approach – each service has a theme assigned to it, a rough idea that the team for that service will flesh out from scratch when the time comes. They may choose to structure the themed event around the traditional liturgy, as a framework to ensure that we have included the elements of the expected spiritual journey. However themes often create their own structure, out of their own internal logic and narrative, which may bear little or no resemblance to any standard church service. If it seems like a risk to let ideas grow to their own natural shape, it’s also a risk to force them into a preconceived notion of liturgical structure.

Sometimes material is resistant to narrative. It’s all good stuff, but we can’t find the storyline. We’ve experienced the recurring problem of finding compelling intellectual content that the team has really enjoyed discovering and discussing, that would make a great sermon or lecture. But we’re not in the business of sermons or lectures, but of participation and interaction. So we have to go through agonies figuring out how to convey our ideas differently, so that it’s not all words, not all done by us. I’m not sure that there’s any way to stop this difficulty arising – sometimes congregational activities come tumbling in playful splendour out of the most abstruse themes, and sometimes a really promising theme leaves us at a loss and unwilling or too late to give up our first ideas.

One advantage of an ideas-based approach is that it isn’t necessary to cover all the ground in one event – there can be multiple parts so that one part is not overloaded or rushed. That requires people to be open to the idea that they will not have the whole journey in one event. Like a TV series, one service might end in an unresolved or dark place. The strength of community worship is that you can take these collective risks – you’re on a long-term journey together, the whole picture will unfold over years. But the visitor may need explanations and reassurance that this fragment or cliffhanger isn’t your only liturgy! We always said at Grace, don’t judge us on one service, come to three.

As an illustration, our last service combined Walter Brueggemann’s understanding of the prophet’s task and methods, with the ‘hero’s journey’ or monomyth as used in movies [Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, etc.]. This is the first service of two, so it ended with a collective reading of Lamentations 5, a flung glass of wine, and silence. Hope and forgiveness must wait until the next service and be hard to understand, if we are to take the material seriously.

One of the factors enabling this serial approach is the traditional Christian calendar. We can treat an entire season of the church year as a unit of our spiritual journey, rather than trying to run through the whole cycle at every event. The more neglected celebrations of the church year – neglected in our church backgrounds anyhow – can be put back into an enriched pattern of communal living. Each season has its own narrative, its distinctive plot points, its irregular chapters. Right now it’s Lent, which is a season that seems to resonate with Grace. What season resonates with your community? What storyline do you follow through it, collectively and as individuals?

image & words © Steve Collins


Steve Collins is a member of Grace alternative worship community in London. He is an architect specialising in corporate interiors, and works for a large practice in central London near Tate Modern. His websites include a photographic archive for alternative worship events; his personal site; and the directory site. He blogs at Small Ritual.

Share

Switch to our mobile site